File

Last modified on: April 19, 2024, 6:36 p.m.

Josquin_Missa_Pange_Lingua_-_Benedictus.mid


Source
Josquin Research Project
Musical Work
Missa Pange lingua
Section
Sanctus (Benedictus)
File Type
Symbolic Music
File Format
.mid
File Size
2.5 KB

Feature Value
Distance Between Two Most Common Vertical Intervals 4.0
Prevalence of Most Common Vertical Interval 0.2572
Prevalence of Second Most Common Vertical Interval 0.2166
Prevalence Ratio of Two Most Common Vertical Intervals 0.8421
Vertical Unisons 0.1123
Vertical Minor Seconds 0.0
Vertical Thirds 0.3821
Vertical Tritones 0.01471
Vertical Perfect Fourths 0.02598
Vertical Perfect Fifths 0.1457
Vertical Sixths 0.1044
Vertical Sevenths 0.0331
Vertical Octaves 0.1448
Perfect Vertical Intervals 0.4289
Vertical Dissonance Ratio 0.0924
Vertical Minor Third Prevalence 0.1146
Vertical Major Third Prevalence 0.151
Chord Duration 2.109
Partial Chords 1.0
Standard Triads 0.0
Diminished and Augmented Triads 0.0
Dominant Seventh Chords 0.0
Seventh Chords 0.0
Non-Standard Chords 0.0
Complex Chords 0.0
Minor Major Triad Ratio 0.0
Average Number of Simultaneous Pitch Classes 1.518
Variability of Number of Simultaneous Pitch Classes 0.4997
Average Number of Simultaneous Pitches 1.617
Variability of Number of Simultaneous Pitches 0.4861
Most Common Vertical Interval 0.0
Second Most Common Vertical Interval 4.0
Dynamic Range 4.0
Variation of Dynamics 1.681
Variation of Dynamics In Each Voice 1.685
Average Note to Note Change in Dynamics 1.761
Unpitched Percussion Instrument Prevalence 0.0
String Keyboard Prevalence 0.0
Acoustic Guitar Prevalence 0.0
Electric Guitar Prevalence 0.0
Violin Prevalence 0.0
Saxophone Prevalence 0.0
Brass Prevalence 0.0
Woodwinds Prevalence 0.0
Orchestral Strings Prevalence 0.0
String Ensemble Prevalence 0.0
Electric Instrument Prevalence 0.0
Variability of Note Prevalence of Pitched Instruments 0.0
Variability of Note Prevalence of Unpitched Instruments 0.0
Number of Pitched Instruments 1.0
Number of Unpitched Instruments 0.0
Chromatic Motion 0.2218
Stepwise Motion 0.6304
Melodic Thirds 0.144
Melodic Perfect Fourths 0.09728
Melodic Tritones 0.0
Melodic Perfect Fifths 0.01946
Melodic Sixths 0.0
Melodic Sevenths 0.0
Melodic Octaves 0.01167
Melodic Large Intervals 0.0
Most Common Melodic Interval 2.0
Minor Major Melodic Third Ratio 2.364
Melodic Embellishments 0.01544
Direction of Melodic Motion 0.5086
Average Length of Melodic Arcs 1.856
Average Interval Spanned by Melodic Arcs 4.64
Melodic Pitch Variety 4.142
Mean Melodic Interval 2.276
Number of Common Melodic Intervals 5.0
Distance Between Most Prevalent Melodic Intervals 1.0
Prevalence of Most Common Melodic Interval 0.4086
Relative Prevalence of Most Common Melodic Intervals 0.5429
Amount of Arpeggiation 0.2724
Repeated Notes 0.09728
Importance of Middle Register 0.4595
Importance of High Register 0.0
Dominant Spread 7.0
Strong Tonal Centres 2.0
Mean Pitch 53.69
Mean Pitch Class 5.552
Most Common Pitch 52.0
Most Common Pitch Class 9.0
Prevalence of Most Common Pitch 0.1583
Prevalence of Most Common Pitch Class 0.1853
Relative Prevalence of Top Pitches 0.8049
Relative Prevalence of Top Pitch Classes 0.9375
Interval Between Most Prevalent Pitches 5.0
Interval Between Most Prevalent Pitch Classes 5.0
Pitch Variability 4.681
Pitch Class Variability 3.553
Pitch Class Variability After Folding 3.116
Pitch Skewness 0.532
Pitch Class Skewness 0.4663
Pitch Class Skewness After Folding 0.6283
Pitch Kurtosis 5.452
Pitch Class Kurtosis 4.89
Pitch Class Kurtosis After Folding 7.158
Major or Minor 0.0
First Pitch 45.0
First Pitch Class 9.0
Last Pitch 50.0
Last Pitch Class 2.0
Glissando Prevalence 0.0
Average Range of Glissandos 0.0
Number of Pitches 13.0
Vibrato Prevalence 0.0
Microtone Prevalence 0.0
Number of Pitch Classes 7.0
Number of Common Pitches 6.0
Number of Common Pitch Classes 0.0
Range 21.0
Importance of Bass Register 0.5405
Note Density per Quarter Note 0.6745
Note Density per Quarter Note per Voice 0.3372
Note Density per Quarter Note Variability 0.3273
Range of Rhythmic Values 7.0
Number of Different Rhythmic Values Present 7.0
Number of Common Rhythmic Values Present 2.0
Prevalence of Very Short Rhythmic Values 0.0
Prevalence of Short Rhythmic Values 0.0
Prevalence of Medium Rhythmic Values 0.722
Simple Initial Meter 1.0
Prevalence of Long Rhythmic Values 0.7259
Prevalence of Very Long Rhythmic Values 0.08108
Prevalence of Dotted Notes 0.1158
Shortest Rhythmic Value 1.0
Longest Rhythmic Value 12.0
Mean Rhythmic Value 2.494
Most Common Rhythmic Value 2.0
Prevalence of Most Common Rhythmic Value 0.4479
Relative Prevalence of Most Common Rhythmic Values 0.6121
Difference Between Most Common Rhythmic Values 2.0
Compound Initial Meter 0.0
Rhythmic Value Variability 1.805
Rhythmic Value Skewness 0.8213
Rhythmic Value Kurtosis 14.56
Mean Rhythmic Value Run Length 1.671
Median Rhythmic Value Run Length 1.0
Variability in Rhythmic Value Run Lengths 0.9196
Mean Rhythmic Value Offset 0.01544
Median Rhythmic Value Offset 0.0
Complex Initial Meter 0.0
Variability of Rhythmic Value Offsets 0.2485
Complete Rests Fraction 0.000002713
Partial Rests Fraction 0.3073
Average Rest Fraction Across Voices 0.1536
Longest Complete Rest 0.0
Longest Partial Rest 16.0
Mean Complete Rest Duration 0.0
Mean Partial Rest Duration 6.556
Median Complete Rest Duration 0.0
Median Partial Rest Duration 4.0
Duple Initial Meter 1.0
Variability of Complete Rest Durations 0.0
Variability of Partial Rest Durations 6.167
Variability Across Voices of Combined Rests 9.899
Number of Strong Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 3.0
Number of Moderate Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 3.0
Number of Relatively Strong Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 3.0
Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 60.0
Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 120.0
Harmonicity of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 2.0
Triple Initial Meter 0.0
Strength of Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 0.5524
Strength of Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 0.2418
Strength Ratio of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 2.285
Combined Strength of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 0.7942
Rhythmic Variability - Tempo Standardized 0.04998
Rhythmic Looseness - Tempo Standardized 0.0
Polyrhythms - Tempo Standardized 0.6667
Quadruple Initial Meter 0.0
Metrical Diversity 1.0
Total Number of Notes 259.0
Initial Tempo 320.0
Average Variability of Time Between Attacks for Each Voice 0.5865
Minimum Note Duration 0.1875
Maximum Note Duration 3.0
Average Note Duration 0.4706
Variability of Note Durations 0.3565
Amount of Staccato 0.0
Number of Strong Rhythmic Pulses 4.0
Number of Moderate Rhythmic Pulses 7.0
Number of Relatively Strong Rhythmic Pulses 7.0
Mean Tempo 320.0
Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 40.0
Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 160.0
Harmonicity of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 4.0
Strength of Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 0.2015
Strength of Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 0.1938
Strength Ratio of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 1.04
Combined Strength of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 0.3953
Rhythmic Variability 0.03147
Rhythmic Looseness 0.0
Polyrhythms 0.4286
Tempo Variability 0.0
Duration in Seconds 72.0
Note Density 3.597
Note Density Variability 1.108
Average Time Between Attacks 0.3559
Average Time Between Attacks for Each Voice 0.5415
Variability of Time Between Attacks 0.2087
Maximum Number of Independent Voices 2.0
Relative Range of Loudest Voice 0.6667
Relative Range Isolation of Loudest Voice 0.1121
Relative Range of Highest Line 0.6667
Relative Note Density of Highest Line 0.4402
Relative Note Durations of Lowest Line 0.928
Relative Size of Melodic Intervals in Lowest Line 1.0
Voice Overlap 0.7992
Voice Separation 6.0
Variability of Voice Separation 0.0
Parallel Motion 0.08411
Average Number of Independent Voices 1.693
Similar Motion 0.1495
Contrary Motion 0.2056
Oblique Motion 0.5607
Parallel Fifths 0.0
Parallel Octaves 0.0
Variability of Number of Independent Voices 0.4614
Voice Equality - Number of Notes 19.09
Voice Equality - Note Duration 1.856
Voice Equality - Dynamics 0.0
Voice Equality - Melodic Leaps 0.0
Voice Equality - Range 2.121
Importance of Loudest Voice 0.0