File

Last modified on: April 20, 2024, 12:03 a.m.

In_te_Domine_speravi_1599_Benedictus_4.mid


Source
RenComp7
Musical Work
Missa In te Domine speravi (1599)
Section
Benedictus
File Type
Symbolic Music
File Format
.mid
File Size
4.3 KB

Feature Value
Distance Between Two Most Common Vertical Intervals 3.0
Prevalence of Most Common Vertical Interval 0.1837
Prevalence of Second Most Common Vertical Interval 0.1824
Prevalence Ratio of Two Most Common Vertical Intervals 0.993
Vertical Unisons 0.047
Vertical Minor Seconds 0.003418
Vertical Thirds 0.3484
Vertical Tritones 0.008545
Vertical Perfect Fourths 0.1122
Vertical Perfect Fifths 0.1837
Vertical Sixths 0.1077
Vertical Sevenths 0.0188
Vertical Octaves 0.1241
Perfect Vertical Intervals 0.467
Vertical Dissonance Ratio 0.08331
Vertical Minor Third Prevalence 0.5104
Vertical Major Third Prevalence 0.494
Chord Duration 1.518
Partial Chords 0.3522
Standard Triads 0.4443
Diminished and Augmented Triads 0.01939
Dominant Seventh Chords 0.003231
Seventh Chords 0.009693
Non-Standard Chords 0.1939
Complex Chords 0.0
Minor Major Triad Ratio 0.4706
Average Number of Simultaneous Pitch Classes 2.531
Variability of Number of Simultaneous Pitch Classes 0.6584
Average Number of Simultaneous Pitches 2.946
Variability of Number of Simultaneous Pitches 0.8037
Most Common Vertical Interval 7.0
Second Most Common Vertical Interval 4.0
Dynamic Range 0.0
Variation of Dynamics 0.0
Variation of Dynamics In Each Voice 0.0
Average Note to Note Change in Dynamics 0.0
Unpitched Percussion Instrument Prevalence 0.0
String Keyboard Prevalence 1.0
Acoustic Guitar Prevalence 0.0
Electric Guitar Prevalence 0.0
Violin Prevalence 0.0
Saxophone Prevalence 0.0
Brass Prevalence 0.0
Woodwinds Prevalence 0.0
Orchestral Strings Prevalence 0.0
String Ensemble Prevalence 0.0
Electric Instrument Prevalence 0.0
Variability of Note Prevalence of Pitched Instruments 0.0
Variability of Note Prevalence of Unpitched Instruments 0.0
Number of Pitched Instruments 1.0
Number of Unpitched Instruments 0.0
Chromatic Motion 0.217
Stepwise Motion 0.7021
Melodic Thirds 0.1468
Melodic Perfect Fourths 0.0383
Melodic Tritones 0.0
Melodic Perfect Fifths 0.03617
Melodic Sixths 0.002128
Melodic Sevenths 0.0
Melodic Octaves 0.002128
Melodic Large Intervals 0.0
Most Common Melodic Interval 2.0
Minor Major Melodic Third Ratio 1.556
Melodic Embellishments 0.04852
Direction of Melodic Motion 0.4817
Average Length of Melodic Arcs 1.787
Average Interval Spanned by Melodic Arcs 4.139
Melodic Pitch Variety 4.425
Mean Melodic Interval 2.174
Number of Common Melodic Intervals 2.0
Distance Between Most Prevalent Melodic Intervals 1.0
Prevalence of Most Common Melodic Interval 0.4851
Relative Prevalence of Most Common Melodic Intervals 0.4474
Amount of Arpeggiation 0.2574
Repeated Notes 0.07234
Importance of Middle Register 0.789
Importance of High Register 0.211
Dominant Spread 7.0
Strong Tonal Centres 3.0
Mean Pitch 68.0
Mean Pitch Class 4.717
Most Common Pitch 72.0
Most Common Pitch Class 0.0
Prevalence of Most Common Pitch 0.1392
Prevalence of Most Common Pitch Class 0.2046
Relative Prevalence of Top Pitches 0.8939
Relative Prevalence of Top Pitch Classes 0.7835
Interval Between Most Prevalent Pitches 5.0
Interval Between Most Prevalent Pitch Classes 2.0
Pitch Variability 5.304
Pitch Class Variability 3.568
Pitch Class Variability After Folding 3.151
Pitch Skewness -0.3031
Pitch Class Skewness 0.6032
Pitch Class Skewness After Folding 1.093
Pitch Kurtosis 5.467
Pitch Class Kurtosis 4.947
Pitch Class Kurtosis After Folding 7.342
Major or Minor 0.0
First Pitch 65.0
First Pitch Class 5.0
Last Pitch 55.0
Last Pitch Class 7.0
Glissando Prevalence 0.0
Average Range of Glissandos 0.0
Number of Pitches 17.0
Vibrato Prevalence 0.0
Microtone Prevalence 0.0
Number of Pitch Classes 9.0
Number of Common Pitches 4.0
Number of Common Pitch Classes 1.0
Range 24.0
Importance of Bass Register 0.0
Note Density per Quarter Note 1.411
Note Density per Quarter Note per Voice 1.411
Note Density per Quarter Note Variability 0.5711
Range of Rhythmic Values 8.0
Number of Different Rhythmic Values Present 7.0
Number of Common Rhythmic Values Present 3.0
Prevalence of Very Short Rhythmic Values 0.0
Prevalence of Short Rhythmic Values 0.02954
Prevalence of Medium Rhythmic Values 0.7215
Simple Initial Meter 1.0
Prevalence of Long Rhythmic Values 0.6245
Prevalence of Very Long Rhythmic Values 0.03376
Prevalence of Dotted Notes 0.08228
Shortest Rhythmic Value 0.5
Longest Rhythmic Value 8.0
Mean Rhythmic Value 2.207
Most Common Rhythmic Value 1.0
Prevalence of Most Common Rhythmic Value 0.346
Relative Prevalence of Most Common Rhythmic Values 1.0
Difference Between Most Common Rhythmic Values 2.0
Compound Initial Meter 0.0
Rhythmic Value Variability 1.451
Rhythmic Value Skewness 0.4274
Rhythmic Value Kurtosis 9.701
Mean Rhythmic Value Run Length 1.844
Median Rhythmic Value Run Length 1.0
Variability in Rhythmic Value Run Lengths 1.29
Mean Rhythmic Value Offset 0.0
Median Rhythmic Value Offset 0.0
Complex Initial Meter 0.0
Variability of Rhythmic Value Offsets 0.0
Complete Rests Fraction 0.0
Partial Rests Fraction 0.0
Average Rest Fraction Across Voices -0.000000000002461
Longest Complete Rest 0.0
Longest Partial Rest 0.0
Mean Complete Rest Duration 0.0
Mean Partial Rest Duration 0.0
Median Complete Rest Duration 0.0
Median Partial Rest Duration 0.0
Duple Initial Meter 0.0
Variability of Complete Rest Durations 0.0
Variability of Partial Rest Durations 0.0
Variability Across Voices of Combined Rests 0.0
Number of Strong Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 3.0
Number of Moderate Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 4.0
Number of Relatively Strong Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 3.0
Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 60.0
Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 40.0
Harmonicity of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 1.5
Triple Initial Meter 0.0
Strength of Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 0.4766
Strength of Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse - Tempo Standardized 0.2617
Strength Ratio of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 1.821
Combined Strength of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses - Tempo Standardized 0.7383
Rhythmic Variability - Tempo Standardized 0.04669
Rhythmic Looseness - Tempo Standardized 0.0
Polyrhythms - Tempo Standardized 0.6667
Quadruple Initial Meter 1.0
Metrical Diversity 1.0
Total Number of Notes 474.0
Initial Tempo 60.0
Average Variability of Time Between Attacks for Each Voice 0.6541
Minimum Note Duration 0.5
Maximum Note Duration 8.0
Average Note Duration 2.207
Variability of Note Durations 1.451
Amount of Staccato 0.0
Number of Strong Rhythmic Pulses 1.0
Number of Moderate Rhythmic Pulses 3.0
Number of Relatively Strong Rhythmic Pulses 1.0
Mean Tempo 60.0
Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 60.0
Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 120.0
Harmonicity of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 2.0
Strength of Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 0.921
Strength of Second Strongest Rhythmic Pulse 0.05395
Strength Ratio of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 17.07
Combined Strength of Two Strongest Rhythmic Pulses 0.975
Rhythmic Variability 0.0727
Rhythmic Looseness 0.0
Polyrhythms 1.0
Tempo Variability 0.0
Duration in Seconds 336.0
Note Density 1.411
Note Density Variability 0.6945
Average Time Between Attacks 1.406
Average Time Between Attacks for Each Voice 1.406
Variability of Time Between Attacks 0.6541
Maximum Number of Independent Voices 1.0
Relative Range of Loudest Voice 1.0
Relative Range Isolation of Loudest Voice 0.0
Relative Range of Highest Line 1.0
Relative Note Density of Highest Line 0.1435
Relative Note Durations of Lowest Line 1.0
Relative Size of Melodic Intervals in Lowest Line 1.0
Voice Overlap 0.0
Voice Separation 0.0
Variability of Voice Separation 0.0
Parallel Motion 0.08651
Average Number of Independent Voices 1.0
Similar Motion 0.1425
Contrary Motion 0.1552
Oblique Motion 0.6158
Parallel Fifths 0.005089
Parallel Octaves 0.0
Variability of Number of Independent Voices 0.0
Voice Equality - Number of Notes 0.0
Voice Equality - Note Duration 0.0
Voice Equality - Dynamics 0.0
Voice Equality - Melodic Leaps 0.0
Voice Equality - Range 0.0
Importance of Loudest Voice 0.0